• Opinion - Curated opinion articles on current affairs and Canadian politics.
  • Polls - Articles on data, insights, polling and research from across Canada.
  • News -
  • US Trade -
  • Trending
  • International -
  • Pods - Curated feed of podcast episodes on current affairs and politics from around the political spectrum.
  • Healthwatch
  • Climate -
  • Economy -
  • Defence -
  • Resources -
  • Indigenous -
  • AI + Tech -
  • Art's History -
  • Politician's Pen - Articles written by sitting and former Canadian politicians.
  • Newsletter - Subscribe to The Buzz, our weekly newsletter with Peter Mansbridge.
  • Advertise -
  • Red
  • BlueDark
  • Orange
  • Green
  • BlueLight
  • Purple
  • Pink
  • Lellow
  • GreyLight
  • Charcoal

Topics

The Buzz March 9th 2024: Canada’s combat readiness, Trump and Biden, and more.

Sit back, relax, sip your favourite morning drink, and welcome to another week of The Buzz. 

My old friend and brilliant foreign correspondent, Brian Stewart, who has covered almost every war, conflict, and natural disaster of the past fifty years, has one major complaint about Canadian journalism. He’s told me more than a few times, “Peter, we don’t have enough coverage of the military.” He wasn’t talking about war coverage; we have a history of distinguished war correspondents (including Brian) that goes back more than a century. He was talking about the kind of coverage we get concerning defence spending, defence acquisitions and defence policy in a changing world. He blames news organizations for not committing enough to that kind of reporting.

Learn More

 

But he’s also the first to concede there are exceptions. Murray Brewster is one of them. 

For years at Canadian Press, he covered the defence beat and now he does the same for the CBC. You want a wake-up call on just how ill-prepared Canada is in terms of combat readiness? Then read this:

State of Canadian Armed Forces' combat readiness growing worse, government report warns

Read >

More on this, the upcoming budget, what to make of the Conservative byelection victory this past week, and Joe Biden’s energetic State of the Union address on Good Talk with me, Susan Delacourt (filling in for the vacationing Chantal) and Bruce Anderson... Find us at nationalnewswatch.com 

 

For those of us who came of age in the 1960’s, it wasn’t uncommon to meet new friends who’d just arrived in Canada.     

And I’m not talking about those who’d arrived as regular immigrants. That had been the norm in Canada for decades, I was one too. No, I’m talking a different kind of immigrant and not a refugee, but a draft dodger. There were thousands over ten years, 40 thousand by some counts, of young Americans who fled the United States because they didn’t want to, or didn’t believe they should, fight for their country in Vietnam. 

Initially, Canada wouldn’t let them past the border, refusing entry if they couldn’t prove they’d been discharged from the US military. That changed when Pierre Trudeau became prime minister in 1968 – at that point, Canada ruled immigration officers could not ask about past military service, only whether they were seeking permanent residence in Canada. At that point, the gates opened.

Eventually, the United States pardoned many of those who had evaded the draft by fleeing to Canada. Jimmy Carter did that as President in 1977. Some headed home but many others stayed, having adjusted to a Canadian way of life and many by finding some pretty good jobs.

The draft dodgers were just a part of those Americans who moved to Canada because of their opposition to the Southeast Asia war. So not just those with a military background but many others who simply felt their country’s position was wrong. In total it’s estimated up to 125 thousand made the change in their home address.

So why am I telling you all this? Two words: Donald Trump. According to Paul Starobin in Business Insider, Americans fearing a Trump reboot are planning to flee their homeland in droves, and guess where their main target for a new home is?

If Trump is reelected, Americans are planning to flee in droves

Read >

 

Meanwhile, in the United States, the presidential nominations seem clear – it’s Round Two of Biden versus Trump. Seriously? 

Two octogenarians (ok Trump will only be 78 on voting day), each with their own problems, battling it out for the so-called “leader of the free world”? In a country of 340 million, that’s the best they could do? And they think we’re boring and unimaginative.
 
Anyway, after Super Tuesday the die is cast so strap yourself in for a long, negative, and consequential campaign. Dan Balz of the Washington Post, one of my favourite reporters in DC, sets the table for us: 

Here comes the general election: Long, negative and consequential

Read >

 

They say more than half the world will see elections this year, and the early forecasts suggest it’s going to be a bad time for incumbents (unless your name has five letters, starts with a “P” and ends with an “n” – then you’re gold).   

I’m particularly fascinated by what’s happening in the United Kingdom where the election could come as early as this spring.
 
If you’re interested in UK politics, or even if you’re not, you might love this piece from the Economist because it’s a poll breakdown like you’ve never seen before. And guess what? You can control the graphics. Go on, enjoy it:

Who's ahead in the British polls?

Read >

Remember the whole Bitcoin-Pierre Poilievre story? Not a good look for the Conservative leader, was it?     

But maybe it deserves an update. Max Fawcett of the National Observer thinks so, and his opinion piece is quite the read:

Pierre Poilievre bites his tongue on Bitcoin 🔒

Read >

A couple of years ago I was sitting on a park bench in Budapest interviewing Michael Ignatieff.

At the time he was President of the highly respected Central European University based in the Hungarian capital. We were talking about human rights and the challenges that cause was facing around the world, and in Hungary itself, because of authoritarian governments. “These single-party states want to control everything – the courts, reduce the space for civil society, even eliminate the press. They want to shrink freedom.” 
 
(You can find the documentary that the interview was done for on YouTube)
Michael and I in conversation in 2018, filming In Search of a Perfect World.
 
Ignatieff knew those were tough words for anyone in the Viktor Orban government to accept, and not surprisingly for statements just like that, Ignatieff and the university were both tossed out of the country a year or so later. 
 
Yesterday that same Orban was in Florida being wined and dined by Donald Trump at Mar a Lago. Before Orban arrived, The New York Times's David Leonhardt wrote about what to expect:

Is Hungary a model for Trump? 🔒

Read >

Remember that piece I flagged a few weeks ago about how some TV networks in the US are considering slashing anchor salaries?

That discussion continues, but it’s not just TV news salaries that are falling. Have you heard about the “post-pandemic correction?”
 
Check this out from Alex Christian, the Features Correspondent for the BBC:

US salaries are falling. Employers say compensation is just 'resetting'

Read >

 

Sorry.  Didn’t mean to upset you with that one.

That’s it for The Buzz this weekend. Have a great week and we’ll connect again in seven days.

The Buzz is a weekly publication from National Newswatch that shares insights and commentary on the week’s developments in politics, news and current affairs.

Subscribe to 'The Buzz' with Peter Mansbridge

Every Saturday, Peter Mansbridge provides thoughtful takes on this week's news stories. Subscribe for FREE! You can unsubscribe any time. 

Full Name
  • About -
  • Advertising + Sponsorship -
  • Newsletter -
  • Privacy & Terms of Use -
  • Sources -

© 2025 National Newswatch