

Welcome to the weekend and welcome to The Buzz.
Back in 2012, when he was still just a mere Prince, Charles, now King Charles the Third, was handed a page to read. After a few lines, he paused, looked into the camera pointed at him and said, “Who the hell wrote this?”
Now it was all good fun back then, as Charles was in Scotland and had agreed to front the national weather forecast on television as part of BBC Scotland’s sixtieth anniversary. Later, on a visit to Canada, he told me that despite nerves, he’d quite enjoyed hosting the segment- something he’d always wanted to do.
For some Canadians, they wished that this year he’d said, “Who the hell wrote this?” when 10 Downing Street asked him, which is their right, to sign off on a state visit invite to US President Donald Trump.
Charles is not only the King of the UK, he’s also King of Canada, and Trump had just finished challenging Canadian sovereignty by calling for us to be his 51st state.
But King Charles said nothing, at least not in public, which has upset more than a few Canadians, including for whatever it’s worth, me.
When I babbled my feelings on my podcast, it got some Canadian monarchists huffing and puffing about constitutions and protocol and all things royal. Fine.
Rest assured, though, the King’s 24-hour visit across the Atlantic to read a speech, this time vetted if not written by the Canadian prime minister, is likely no accident.
I think we can assume this classifies as a do-over, and it will be a speech dripping with great lines about the sanctity of Canadian sovereignty.
Thank you, King Charles: give the speech, plant a tree, wave to crowds, inspect a guard of honour, look up to a flypast, and then it’s off for the flight home. We’ll pick up the tab, I’m sure.
As someone who has covered the royals, including Charles, through many a moment since a 1970 visit to Manitoba, I’ve enjoyed every assignment. I quite admire certain members of the family, with Charles’s late mother at the top of the list. She was amazing, and we can only wonder how she would have handled this latest Trump invite issue.
Janet Davison of the CBC has this piece about how unprecedented this trip will be:

Why King Charles's upcoming visit to Canada is unprecedented in many ways
So, ten weeks after Mark Carney was sworn in as Prime Minister, what’s your take on the way he is shaping the office around him?
Well, here’s a view for you to consider. It comes from The Hub’s Joanna Baron:

Joanna Baron: Mark Carney is the prime minister—he should stop acting like a president
What should we expect in the Throne Speech as it outlines the Carney government’s agenda for the parliamentary session ahead?
Lawrence Martin had some thoughts on that in The Globe:

🔒 High expectations are an albatross for Carney. His Throne Speech must lower them
No matter who the prime minister is, he or she can often be judged by the man or woman who stands at their side.
Who determines access. Who monitors the successes or failures of ministers. Who helps assess policy. That person is the PM’s Chief of Staff. Mark Carney has one, but not for much longer and it seems he’s having trouble finding a permanent one.
The Globe’s award-winning Bob Fife focused on that this week:

🔒 Carney unable to find permanent chief of staff after courting high-profile candidates
Just weeks after pulling the Liberal party from a near-death experience in the polls, it’s a bit strange to see that Mark Carney is having problems with a restive caucus.
But when veteran journalists like the Toronto Star’s Susan Delacourt tell you so, you listen up:

If you have been trying to follow the puck on where the new government really stands on the key issue of housing, then you probably feel a little like a Toronto Maple Leaf. Whenever you think you see the puck in front of you, it isn’t.
But let’s try to figure this out because maybe it’s not as complicated as it looks. Maybe.
David Moscrop has a great piece in the current Walrus:

Mark Carney Promised Affordable Housing. Now Comes the Impossible Part
There are all kinds of cabinets.
Inner cabinets, outer cabinets, shadow cabinets to name a few. Most parties try to keep the number of members low, at least when they start. But I guess if the leader is a little worried about keeping everyone happy while he/she is trying to hold on to his/her job, you have to keep the troops happy. Is that what’s happened with the Poilievre Conservatives? Would you believe a 74-member shadow cabinet?
Let’s check in with Stephanie Taylor at the National Post:

🔒 Poilievre picks experience over fresh faces in 74-person 'shadow cabinet'
Whither the NDP? Things look pretty bleak for the party that just a decade ago was the official opposition with more than a hundred seats.
Not now, barely holding onto seven seats and without official party status. Things have been this bad before, like during the 1990s. They came back then, but can they come back again? And if they do, where does it start?
Maybe the west, far west. Wolfgang Depner wrote this for Canadian Press:

B.C. seen as 'final frontier' for federal NDP as leadership question looms
Lots more on all this in our YouTube podcasts this week. First up, Chantal Hebert and Rob Russo on this week’s Good Talk, which you can find right here.
And then Bruce Anderson and Fred DeLorey with Smoke, Mirrors and the Truth, which you can see right here.
Time for our end-of-The-Buzz feature for this week.
In July, I’m heading for what I’m told is needed eye surgery. Cataract to be exact. I’m a bit anxious about it as I’m sure anyone would be when someone, an expert surgeon of course, is going to be poking around your eyes with a sharp instrument. But I’ve read a lot, Watched videos. Met with the doctor. So, I’m cool.
Especially so when I read what the future may bring for eye surgery, like this from studyfinds.org

Revolutionary Contact Lenses Let Humans See The Invisible
Okay, I’m still anxious. And that’s The Buzz for this week. Thanks for reading, and see you again in seven days.
The Buzz is a weekly publication from National Newswatch that shares insights and commentary on the week’s developments in politics, news and current affairs.